> I don't understand why people keep arguing that the incitement thing is blurry. What you are really saying is that you don't think it is blurry. The reason

> I don't understand why people keep arguing that the incitement thing is blurry. What you are really saying is that you don't think it is blurry. The reason people argue that it is blurry is because they want to advance the interests of that side. So they argue whatever they can, including the blur, which might give them a 50-50 chance of prevailing in amongst the confusion. It's how people argue when they can't prevail in an argument based on principle, logic, or literality.