3 ms·
1) that's a different process, not the process followed for the specific signature audit 2) even that casual process caught 11% of the fraud 3) where is evide
by VikingCoder 6y ago
1) that's a different process, not the process followed for the specific signature audit
2) even that casual process caught 11% of the fraud
3) where is evidence of ANY sizable signature fraud? Your article indicates we should have caught about 11% of it, even without the more strict signature audit.
4) you still haven't answered how you find 11,800 people whose signatures you can fake, and be sure they won't ALSO vote at a later date, which would be detected.
We done yet?
No?
Prove it in court.
Or just accept the outcome of this election, and get started trying to improve security for the next election.