4 ms·

> large proportion of Americans are radicalized in uncensored You do realize, both sides of America think the other side is radicalized. This was literally the

> large proportion of Americans are radicalized in uncensored You do realize, both sides of America think the other side is radicalized. This was literally the reaction on Trump's first day of office: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXR3d22BhHs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXR3d22BhHs Have you forgotten about that? Does that look anything like the 6th? No, of course it doesn't. Had those people been let into the State House, it may have burned to the ground in 2017! > insufficiently moderated community Section 230 was put in place because it's difficult to moderate effectively when you're trying to launch a startup. Are you saying no one can launch a social network unless they have the money and staff to moderate each an every single post that comes in?

modriano 6y ago
> You do realize, both sides of America think the other side is radicalized. On Wednesday, while our elected Representatives and Senators were in the process of finalizing the count of the US election, armed Trump supporters stormed the US Capitol. Several of these people were carrying zip-tie handcuffs and were hunting for Mike Pence, Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck Schumer. 5 people died in this insurrection attempt. Here's the video of the QAnon insurrectionist who was shot by the Capitol Police as she was breaking into the area where our elected Reps and Senators had retreated to. This was an attempt to overthrow our government, and it's a matter of luck that our legislators weren't executed by this mob. Attempting to "Both Sides" this is intellectually dishonest, as a riot in the streets is a categorically different thing than a seditious conspiracy that involved the violent disruption of the finalization of results from our election. > Are you saying no one can launch a social network unless they have the money and staff to moderate each an every single post that comes in? I'm not intimately familiar with Section 230, but I don't want my country destroyed. If Google and Apple facilitate distribution of a toxic product that destroys my country, that's a problem for me. [0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2021/01/08/ashli-babbitt-shooting-video-capitol/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2021/01/08/ash...

modriano 6y ago

> You do realize, both sides of America think the other side is radicalized. On Wednesday, while our elected Representatives and Senators were in the process of finalizing the count of the US election, armed Trump supporters stormed the US Capitol. Several of these people were carrying zip-tie handcuffs and were hunting for Mike Pence, Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck Schumer. 5 people died in this insurrection attempt. Here's the video of the QAnon insurrectionist who was shot by the Capitol Police as she was breaking into the area where our elected Reps and Senators had retreated to. This was an attempt to overthrow our government, and it's a matter of luck that our legislators weren't executed by this mob. Attempting to "Both Sides" this is intellectually dishonest, as a riot in the streets is a categorically different thing than a seditious conspiracy that involved the violent disruption of the finalization of results from our election. > Are you saying no one can launch a social network unless they have the money and staff to moderate each an every single post that comes in? I'm not intimately familiar with Section 230, but I don't want my country destroyed. If Google and Apple facilitate distribution of a toxic product that destroys my country, that's a problem for me. [0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2021/01/08/ashli-babbitt-shooting-video-capitol/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2021/01/08/ash...