3 ms·

Please remove the blinkers. Dozens of murderous world leaders that regularly espouse violence are still on Twitter but Trump is eliminated. BLM leaders who exp

Please remove the blinkers. Dozens of murderous world leaders that regularly espouse violence are still on Twitter but Trump is eliminated. BLM leaders who explicitly called for violence, arson and looting were never "fact-checked". Not until they started openly talking about murdering whites. Face it - this is because the Twitter CEO actively dislikes Trump and has little to do with any sort of violent speech.

gamblor956 6y ago
Cite even one example of a BLM leader explicitly (or even implicitly) calling for violence, arson, and looting. Go ahead, I'll wait. You won't find anyone, because it didn't happen. OTOH, the Proud Boys did explicitly call for violence, arson, and looting during the BLM rights, and their leader admitted as much in a live television interview.
- lenkite 6y ago
  What ? There are dozens of such videos. Do your own research please. This stuff never make it to NYT/CNBC/Liberal media btw. https://twitter.com/MarinaMedvin/status/1299930096472657920 https://twitter.com/MarinaMedvin/status/1299930096472657920 https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-leader-if-change-doesnt-happen-we-will-burn-down-this-system/ https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-leader-if-change-doesnt-ha... https://therightscoop.com/portland-black-lives-matter-leader-openly-advocates-for-murder-of-police-video/ https://therightscoop.com/portland-black-lives-matter-leader... Regarding whites should be "wiped out" https://www.dailywire.com/news/blm-leader-says-whites-sub-human-should-be-wiped-joseph-curl https://www.dailywire.com/news/blm-leader-says-whites-sub-hu... Black Lives Matter leader justifies rioting in interview with Tomi Lahren: https://www.foxnews.com/media/black-lives-matter-president-riot https://www.foxnews.com/media/black-lives-matter-president-r... “When the fires were burning, and people were chanting, I just felt liberated for a brief moment, and I felt for one of the only times in my life that the government had no control over me," said Newsome. Now replace Newsome by a Trump supporter. Suddenly it needs "suppression".
  - gamblor956 6y ago
    The guy saying we are going to "burn down the system" did not actual want people to burn down the system. If you had read the entire quote, you would have seen that it was a metaphor for voting. Similarly, there is no "video" in which BLM speakers advocate killing cops. The video does not exist; the transcript was made up in its entirety by right-wing extremist Paul Watson, a British neo-Nazi. And the twitter quote you lead off with: was made up by the poster, along with her other tweets, which are easily debunked by visiting the posts she links to as evidence. Next time you might want to actually do some follow-up evidence before you blindly swallow right-wing extremist lies. Given how closely aligned your links are with neo-Nazi extremists, I'm not going to engage further.
    - lenkite 6y ago
      For record, I am no neo-nazi extremist. I am coloured btw. Did not downvote you. But your reply just fascinates me. How do you even compare "burning down the system" as a metaphor for voting ? Do you even truly recognise your own bias here where Trumps tweets are taken as a "incitement to violence" whereas any statement made by a BLM leader is played down as peaceful ? What is being made up here precisely ? Here is another BLM protester https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/blm-protester-caught-on-camera-threatening-to-put-police-in-the-f-ing-grave https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/blm-protester-caught... Ridiculously justifying Looting as "Reparations" https://nypost.com/2020/08/13/blm-organizer-who-called-looting-reparations-doubles-down/ https://nypost.com/2020/08/13/blm-organizer-who-called-looti... (This even came up in the Chicago Tribune btw not just your "neo-nazi-news") How much more evidence will you need ?
    - snowflake_ptr 6y ago
      > Cite even one example of a BLM leader explicitly (or even implicitly) calling for violence, arson, and looting. He cited it. You're refusing to acknowledge it. > The guy saying we are going to "burn down the system" did not actual want people to burn down the system. If you had read the entire quote, you would have seen that it was a metaphor for voting. False. If you had read the article, you would have seen what he said next: "All right? And I could be speaking figuratively. I could be speaking literally. It’s a matter of interpretation" That's literally as close as you can get to inciting violence without getting in legal trouble. This is a BLM leader inciting violence, full stop. > neo-Nazi > neo-Nazi > neo-Nazi All labels, no arguments. This is called "anti-intellectualism" as well as "ad-hominem". The fact that you refuse to acknowledge the valid example GP presented to your challenge, in addition to your absence of any sort of logic whatsover, show pretty conclusively that you're not actually interested in holding a debate - just slandering those who don't agree with you.
caconym_ 6y ago
Please read my comment again and see that I did not suggest any defense of Twitter's not banning people who are not Trump. Less of blinkers and more of blindfold, I guess. Why is this so hard for people?

gamblor956 6y ago

Cite even one example of a BLM leader explicitly (or even implicitly) calling for violence, arson, and looting. Go ahead, I'll wait. You won't find anyone, because it didn't happen. OTOH, the Proud Boys did explicitly call for violence, arson, and looting during the BLM rights, and their leader admitted as much in a live television interview.

lenkite 6y ago
What ? There are dozens of such videos. Do your own research please. This stuff never make it to NYT/CNBC/Liberal media btw. https://twitter.com/MarinaMedvin/status/1299930096472657920 https://twitter.com/MarinaMedvin/status/1299930096472657920 https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-leader-if-change-doesnt-happen-we-will-burn-down-this-system/ https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-leader-if-change-doesnt-ha... https://therightscoop.com/portland-black-lives-matter-leader-openly-advocates-for-murder-of-police-video/ https://therightscoop.com/portland-black-lives-matter-leader... Regarding whites should be "wiped out" https://www.dailywire.com/news/blm-leader-says-whites-sub-human-should-be-wiped-joseph-curl https://www.dailywire.com/news/blm-leader-says-whites-sub-hu... Black Lives Matter leader justifies rioting in interview with Tomi Lahren: https://www.foxnews.com/media/black-lives-matter-president-riot https://www.foxnews.com/media/black-lives-matter-president-r... “When the fires were burning, and people were chanting, I just felt liberated for a brief moment, and I felt for one of the only times in my life that the government had no control over me," said Newsome. Now replace Newsome by a Trump supporter. Suddenly it needs "suppression".
- gamblor956 6y ago
  The guy saying we are going to "burn down the system" did not actual want people to burn down the system. If you had read the entire quote, you would have seen that it was a metaphor for voting. Similarly, there is no "video" in which BLM speakers advocate killing cops. The video does not exist; the transcript was made up in its entirety by right-wing extremist Paul Watson, a British neo-Nazi. And the twitter quote you lead off with: was made up by the poster, along with her other tweets, which are easily debunked by visiting the posts she links to as evidence. Next time you might want to actually do some follow-up evidence before you blindly swallow right-wing extremist lies. Given how closely aligned your links are with neo-Nazi extremists, I'm not going to engage further.
  - lenkite 6y ago
    For record, I am no neo-nazi extremist. I am coloured btw. Did not downvote you. But your reply just fascinates me. How do you even compare "burning down the system" as a metaphor for voting ? Do you even truly recognise your own bias here where Trumps tweets are taken as a "incitement to violence" whereas any statement made by a BLM leader is played down as peaceful ? What is being made up here precisely ? Here is another BLM protester https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/blm-protester-caught-on-camera-threatening-to-put-police-in-the-f-ing-grave https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/blm-protester-caught... Ridiculously justifying Looting as "Reparations" https://nypost.com/2020/08/13/blm-organizer-who-called-looting-reparations-doubles-down/ https://nypost.com/2020/08/13/blm-organizer-who-called-looti... (This even came up in the Chicago Tribune btw not just your "neo-nazi-news") How much more evidence will you need ?
  - snowflake_ptr 6y ago
    > Cite even one example of a BLM leader explicitly (or even implicitly) calling for violence, arson, and looting. He cited it. You're refusing to acknowledge it. > The guy saying we are going to "burn down the system" did not actual want people to burn down the system. If you had read the entire quote, you would have seen that it was a metaphor for voting. False. If you had read the article, you would have seen what he said next: "All right? And I could be speaking figuratively. I could be speaking literally. It’s a matter of interpretation" That's literally as close as you can get to inciting violence without getting in legal trouble. This is a BLM leader inciting violence, full stop. > neo-Nazi > neo-Nazi > neo-Nazi All labels, no arguments. This is called "anti-intellectualism" as well as "ad-hominem". The fact that you refuse to acknowledge the valid example GP presented to your challenge, in addition to your absence of any sort of logic whatsover, show pretty conclusively that you're not actually interested in holding a debate - just slandering those who don't agree with you.

caconym_ 6y ago

Please read my comment again and see that I did not suggest any defense of Twitter's not banning people who are not Trump. Less of blinkers and more of blindfold, I guess. Why is this so hard for people?