3 ms·
by inciting more violence through disenfranchisement of desperate individuals. it's a pretty common occurrence, historically.
by serf 6y ago
by inciting more violence through disenfranchisement of desperate individuals.
it's a pretty common occurrence, historically.
- JMTQp8lwXL 6y agoI would be humbled by data that proved or rejected the idea that disenfranchisement of actors who organize violence from mainstream platforms actually prevents or reduces its occurrence. There's a fair point to be made that they'll move on elsewhere, but what if that slightly increased barrier friction is enough to stop them? No harm, no fowl, if that's the case. We traded a small bit of free speech for public safety, the ROI looks good, if it's so.