> It's a matter of law that they answer to the legislature, this isn't an "assumption." I could have expressed myself better there - I was distinguishing betwe

> It's a matter of law that they answer to the legislature, this isn't an "assumption." I could have expressed myself better there - I was distinguishing between them being answerable to the legislature (de jure) in the logical, org chat way, and them "answering" to a mercurial president they ideologically agree with (de facto), in the here and now.