4 ms·
I agree that there isn't a proper correlation between score and quality on most comments, but it's comments about specific topics that I don't know a lot about
by guptaneil 15y ago
I agree that there isn't a proper correlation between score and quality on most comments, but it's comments about specific topics that I don't know a lot about that I would want to see scores. How am I supposed to know if you're talking out of your ass or actually saying something useful if I know nothing about the topic? The scores allowed me to quickly determine the trustworthiness of a comment.
- tptacek 15y agoI think you just missed the whole thread of people explaining why scores did not allow you to determine the trustworthiness of a comment.
- guptaneil 15y agoThere is a subtle difference between quality and trustworthiness. It's possible I missed the thread you're talking about, but as far as I can see, most of the discussions here are discussing quality. Like I said, I agree score does not correlate to quality necessarily. I was simply pointing out that in the case of specialized topics like wheels mentioned, even a score of 5 is a useful signal in telling me that it's trustworthy, versus reading a comment with a score of 1 that could be complete BS and should be taken with a grain of salt.
- jeromec 15y agoeven a score of 5 is a useful signal in telling me that it's trustworthy But that can be a false signal. It's quite possible to have eloquent writers make total crap written in an authoritative style sound believable enough to have 5 people nod and upvote. Having no scores forces people to do their own research and form their own conclusion about trustworthiness, which is more work, but better.
- alain94040 15y agoAgreed. We have been through that argument a hundred times: a high score means the comment is a must-read. Period. Why anyone wants to hide useful information is beyond me.