> Over 1000 sworn affidavits from witnesses. The number of affidavits is a rather meaningless number. The quality of the affidavits is much more important, and

> Over 1000 sworn affidavits from witnesses. The number of affidavits is a rather meaningless number. The quality of the affidavits is much more important, and those have been found much less impressive by courts. > What exactly is the point of voting in your state running legit by the book fraud proof elections, if another state isn't going to verify signatures to make sure there are no fraudulent ballots? If that other state's laws don't allow signature matching or make it optional, then that's their prerogative; states choose how to run their elections, after all. It doesn't mean you have to be happy with their choice, by any means, but it's still their choice. > Even if your legitimate election state is won, the unsecure election state will nullify your state with their electoral count. How do electoral votes from one state "nullify" electoral votes from another? One state's electoral votes will get counted regardless of what other states do. > Because the Supreme Court said it doesn't matter. The US Constitution says states get to choose how their elections are run. If one state doesn't like how another state runs their election? Too bad.