3 ms·
> we've structured the project as a non-profit entity, so it can never be bought, has no investors, and isn't "owned" by anyone Never is a long time. Non-prof
by nostromo 6y ago
> we've structured the project as a non-profit entity, so it can never be bought, has no investors, and isn't "owned" by anyone
Never is a long time. Non-profits can become for-profits. Non-profits can also spin off of their profitable components as for-profits -- just like the Mozilla Corporation is a for-profit owned by the non-profit Mozilla Foundation. Non-profits can sell ads and sell your data.
And, of course, non-profits can get money hungry just like any other organization. Look at how ICANN has found ways to vacuum up billions of dollars from the internet.
They also may not technically have any investors, but they have a de facto investor in the form a $100m loan from WhatsApp founder Brian Acton who is also on the board. He could have made it a gift, but did not -- which implies he wants the money back at some point. Signal will need a lot of donations to pay that money back -- or they could decide to sell ads or data.
All that said, I'm happy Signal is doing well, and applaud their efforts. I hope they succeed.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- leoplct 6y agoIf it will be, we will switch again as done with WhatsApp. What’s problem? They have invested years giving it for free, now the ask the price (data) and users go away.
- SebastianKra 6y agoWhatsApp proves that switching away from an unfavorable service is not as easy as you think. It is still essential in many countries, and many users, including myself, are unable to switch. This is why companies first offer a product for free to gain a user base, and only then think about monetization.
- crossroadsguy 6y agoIt also proves that it will never be easy and the choice is just move away or suck it up. I decided just to move away. Like I did with Fb and Insta. If needed I will do that again - away from Signal.