3 ms·
If they are terrorists, would you support police opening live fire on them. Just curious. Seems like all the SJW are now advocating for a Tiananmen square massa
by dukeofdoom 6y ago
If they are terrorists, would you support police opening live fire on them. Just curious. Seems like all the SJW are now advocating for a Tiananmen square massacre of unarmed protesters, just because the TV told them who to hate.
- whytaka 6y agoI don't recall the Tiananmen Square student protestors storming the National People's Congress. Also, these insurrectionists were armed with bombs and had planned on taking hostages as pictures show.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- californical 6y agoLol no of course not. They tried to use force to terrorize the US government, so they could get their way. But they should be stopped with the minimum necessary force to prevent harm to others. So I think the individual police officers (mostly) acted appropriately for the situation. The police organization’s planning was beyond negligent though. You make a good point about some people’s response — the insanity caused by polarization clearly goes both ways, if there’s people saying everyone should’ve been shot. I’m kind of surprised more people weren’t shot though tbh. I always thought there were snipers and armed guards ready 24/7 around that whole area
- SpaceManNabs 6y ago"if they are terrorists"
- rootusrootus 6y agoAs soon as they crossed the outer barricades, I support the use of tear gas, pepper spray, and rubber bullets, just like the police would use on leftist protesters. Inside the building, when they are about to breach the chambers of congress -and- there are legislators inside, I support the use of deadly force. When they attack democracy, they are attacking all of us. And I don't care what their ideology is. If the building is empty, then I think deadly force is unwarranted.