4 ms·
I dont think it is meant as an absolvement of his actions but rather a sensible explanation how certain people cooperated with the crowd without obvious benefit
by Out_of_Characte 6y ago
I dont think it is meant as an absolvement of his actions but rather a sensible explanation how certain people cooperated with the crowd without obvious benefit.
- rchaud 6y agoThat still doesn't hold water. A closer parallel would be breaking into the church with a group of armed people with the intention of disrupting the proceedings. Standing up for the wrong hymn doesn't necessitate a lawyer-approved 'statement' to the press.
- awillen 6y agoYeah I mean the key difference is if you get caught up in the actions of a mob of armed insurrectionists, that means you were in a crowd of armed insurrectionists in the first place.