> all claims and evidence are evaluated on their own merits That is demonstrably not true. There is a legal definition of what an expert witness is, and their

> all claims and evidence are evaluated on their own merits That is demonstrably not true. There is a legal definition of what an expert witness is, and their testimony has more weight. > election/voter fraud as a claim is hardly extraordinary. On the scale being claimed, enough to overturn multiple States' General Elections, yes it, is an extraordinary claim. > People are charged and convicted of such crimes every election cycle No, people are not "charged and convicted" of ELECTION FRAUD every election cycle. Some small number of people have been convicted of VOTER FRAUD. Please do not conflate the two, as the scope of their impact is completely different. > You can't shut people up. I literally ASKED why people are still raising one specific objection. No one has attempted an actual defense of that specific objection. They have moved the goalposts to other objections. It is unreasonable to bring up objections to Dominion voting machines in Georgia in the 2020 election. Anyone who does so should shut the hell up, or offer new evidence.