3 ms·
the consumption is very SQLish based. "operational toil is higher with Spark" <- I agree with this, this is why I'm leaning towards Redshift. Throwing away half
by dancrystalbeach 6y ago
the consumption is very SQLish based. "operational toil is higher with Spark" <- I agree with this, this is why I'm leaning towards Redshift. Throwing away half the codebase in favor of some SQL statements is tempting.