3 ms·
It should be noted that plenty of sources that is describe as reliable has disputed quality in term of bias, which I would generally describe as the difference
by belorn 6y ago
It should be noted that plenty of sources that is describe as reliable has disputed quality in term of bias, which I would generally describe as the difference between fact and narrative. The factual reporting from those are usually true, but the narrative might not be, and thus WP authors need to take care of omissions and added opinions by the journalists.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- clairity 6y agoyes, npr has been my main news source for a while, but i can no longer listen for more than a few minutes at a time (to try to stay informed) because the outrage narratives have been turned up to 11. it's non-stop and highly grating. certain voices are an insta-off for me and the list of those voices only keeps growing.