3 ms·
It's not clear to me that the person I replied to was talking about language semantics. The phrasing of that comment would have taken the form "may not" or "can
by bachmeier 6y ago
It's not clear to me that the person I replied to was talking about language semantics. The phrasing of that comment would have taken the form "may not" or "can't assume", but instead asserted that you can write some code that's guaranteed to run differently, which is implementation semantics.
- sokoloff 6y agoIt says “semantics of Scheme” directly (and IMO unambiguously) upthread. What would that more likely be than the language?