3 ms·
Not sure about Switch, but recent AMD based consoles should have good video decoding capabilities. You can do fine without Bink there. So instead of trolling a
by shmerl 6y ago
Not sure about Switch, but recent AMD based consoles should have good video decoding capabilities. You can do fine without Bink there.
So instead of trolling again, analyze where it's heading. I don't see any reason why Bink can't be replaced by free codecs.
- pjmlp 6y agoBecause what matters is what comes on the SDK and AAA game engines, regardless of what AMD supports. I can call Epic, Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft, Apple, Google when something doesn't work as expected, free codecs dumped on github, who knows.
- pacificat0r 6y ago:D It's heading towards what you predict at the speed we're heading to be in the year of linux on desktop. PS4/XB1 have been enormously more powerful than PS3/Xb360 and yet almost all games on those consoles that play a video do it using Bink even if both consoles have that AMD hardware you mention. The current generation PS5, etc is way more powerful than PS4, and yet bink still seems to still dominate in the limited titles that we can see.
- shmerl 6y agoThat's not a technical problem, sounds like incumbent problem to me. And this also negates your argument that Bink is needed because hardware can't support other codecs. Apparently it's powerful and it can? So why even bring that as a reason.