4 ms·
I like these rules, and you do great work keeping things on track. This scenario got me thinking, though: what if all but one thing in an article falls into the
by hunter2_ 6y ago
I like these rules, and you do great work keeping things on track. This scenario got me thinking, though: what if all but one thing in an article falls into the "doesn't add any significant information and is therefore not a good HN submission" bucket? Is it better to move on without discussing it here because we only discuss complete works, or is there a mechanism to have this community discuss just one particular fact that unfortunately doesn't have a URL dedicated to it?
Actually, it would have a URL dedicated to it if the submitter used a `#:~:text=` fragment.
- pvg 6y agoThe standard mechanism you'll find in the dangworks is you submit the thing and write a (almost certainly first) comment about that one interesting thing. You get to steer the discussion somewhat but not frame it entirely.
- throwaway201103 6y agoI would say, submit the article with a neturalized title, then post a comment highlighting the interesting fact to start the discussion. Edit: sorry pvg, your comment wasn't there when I started to post mine.