In almost none of those cases did the Plaintiffs actually present evidence of fraud. In fact, in many cases, when asked, the lawyers explicitly denied that they

In almost none of those cases did the Plaintiffs actually present evidence of fraud. In fact, in many cases, when asked, the lawyers explicitly denied that they were fraud cases. So if the evidence was so strong, why wasn't it presented to the court? Your 2cd best bet is to blame incompetent lawyers, but my money is on the crappy quality of the so-called evidence. Like where they said Michigan counties over-counted but they counties were actually in Minnesota.