2 ms·
>The meme here that they just let them in doesn't reflect what can be clearly seen in the video footage Because you have chosen to take a tunnel vision and loo
by kumarvvr 6y ago
>The meme here that they just let them in doesn't reflect what can be clearly seen in the video footage
Because you have chosen to take a tunnel vision and look at some videos to declare the possibility of police being complicit just a "meme"
You fight fire with fire.
If you choose one video to "prove" they are not complicit, I choose another video proving my point.
But if someone has a broader view that includes possibilities and probabilities, I speak their language.
Why? Because I feel the only way to talk to a person with a set point of view is to outright refute them with evidence or ignore them entirely.
No use of trying to show the whole picture.
- jonnycomputer 6y agoI don't have a set point of view. You don't even know me. I am guilty, however, of writing poorly. I said that it was a meme, and that the evidence in video footage does not unambiguously substantiate the meme. I didn't deny the possibility of the police being complicit. A few confusing videos of a few officers acting in ways that I don't understand in stressful situations (in a police department with over 2000), or the speculation of (so-called) experts that it might have been, just is insufficient for me to accuse that police department of participating in a coup. In fact, I am urgently concerned that there was a conspiracy by the police department to commit insurrection. I am desperately afraid that it was a coordinated coup. Trump's reticence to provide National Guard support, and the fact that Pence actually gave the order, is very troubling. But I'm not gonna believe catchy easy narratives that push all the buttons. That's how millions of Trumpers got to believing that the election was stolen in the first place.
- kumarvvr 6y agoWell, Ok then.