In those cases the defendants didn't know they were talking with government agents, whereas in this case they knew the person telling them to do this was the pr

In those cases the defendants didn't know they were talking with government agents, whereas in this case they knew the person telling them to do this was the president. And it's much harder to claim that these people were criminally predisposed when it was Trump who was telling them that the election was stolen. I realize that proving entrapment is a very high bar, but I don't you can infer anything relevant here from those FBI cases.