Shouldn't the first question be "would you find the case for the insurrection against the British persuasive"? I certainly see no reason to give these folks th

Shouldn't the first question be "would you find the case for the insurrection against the British persuasive"? I certainly see no reason to give these folks the compliment of comparing their movement to that one... And then the second question would become "how competent were the people involved, and how effective was their action?" Where the answer to both seems to be "not very" for these idiots. Why are people insisting on making ridiculous comparisons between things that have the same rough outline but wildly different material circumstances. It's like some people can only see things in abstractions and not realize that individual situations are unique and need to be judged in their specific contexts.