3 ms·
Wouldn't the opposite be giving to those organizations directly? I'm not opposed to Smile, but presumably it isn't intended to be the only source of funding. St
by blacksmith_tb 6y ago
Wouldn't the opposite be giving to those organizations directly? I'm not opposed to Smile, but presumably it isn't intended to be the only source of funding. Still, like you say, it's better than not giving anything.
- dunefox 6y agoThe opposite of using Amazon Smile is not using it. It costs you nothing and benefits charities.