3 ms·
> They only counted the images, so they can't know - but if they just release the images you can know? Yes, because the images have serial numbers. It's not di
by djsumdog 6y ago
> They only counted the images, so they can't know - but if they just release the images you can know?
Yes, because the images have serial numbers. It's not difficult to understand.
- horsawlarway 6y agoSerial numbers easily checked in any sort of, oh... umm... audit or fucking recount? You argue from a position of bad faith, with doctored evidence and a clear intent to muddy the waters instead of seek truth.
- dang 6y agoBetween this, "you lie" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25675365 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25675365), and "shut the fuck up" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25673632 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25673632) you broke the site guidelines so egregiously that I decided to ban you. You can't post like this to HN, regardless of how wrong someone else is or you feel they are. Being right doesn't make it ok to take this community further into hellflames. Moreover, we've had to warn you about this before: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21162256 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21162256. I'm currently banning so many accounts that have built up track records of abusing HN that it would be easiest to just add one more. However, I looked at your commenting history and it's mostly quite good, so instead I'm going to put this down as an episode of going on tilt under pressure (it happens to all of us) and just ask you to please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and not sink to this kind of the thing in the future.