3 ms·
Not needing to write markup at the time of content generation even better than writing HTML, though. Use any of a million static site generators and get the ben
by TheRealPomax 6y ago
Not needing to write markup at the time of content generation even better than writing HTML, though. Use any of a million static site generators and get the benefit of writing what you want to write in the most efficient format for that, without needing to program the typesetting markup while you're writing.
HTML is in no way the best tool for write content. But it is the best tool to serve content in a browser.
- m___ 6y agoThe browser is the bitch. Out of control, bloated, willingly so, in interaction with layers of scripting on both sides. The server and client are bait. There should be a serious effort to tackle the world of academics and their use of analog tools for digital publishing. Nothing is better mined and searched(for any entity not meta-rapers that "employ" slave coders as battery-chickens) as text. There should be a tendency to reductionist auto-censuring or have coders but one ambition? Being scooped up by corporations for scraps so they can piggy back on their wild efforts for cents on the dollar?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- TheRealPomax 6y agoAre you okay over there? It sounds like you got a little lost.