4 ms·
As was said, this is just a slippery slope argument. Which is especially odd considering the platforms already have all the power they need. There is no more
by jayd16 6y ago
As was said, this is just a slippery slope argument. Which is especially odd considering the platforms already have all the power they need. There is no more power to give.
- captain_price7 6y ago> There is no more power to give Ability to censor top level politicians, deciding what constitutes acceptable and what needs to be censored is not the kind of power they used to have. Edit: bit clarification
- jayd16 6y agoThey just did it so I think it certainly was.
- dwaltrip 6y agoThis isn't true. Private entities have never been required to distribute messages from US officials or politicians. I believe the only exceptions are certain emergency broadcasts.
- captain_price7 6y agoI wasn't talking strictly about legal ability.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- dwaltrip 6y agoI'm not sure what you mean then. What power or abilities have changed?
- three_seagrass 6y agoYep. The comment presumes that there is a need to delegate power to a single arbiter (there isn't).