> It seems to me that suggesting that this "takedown" has anything remotely to do with what is being discussed here is disingenous. What "seems to you" is enti

> It seems to me that suggesting that this "takedown" has anything remotely to do with what is being discussed here is disingenous. What "seems to you" is entirely wrong, but I'm curious as to how you would rationalize dismissing that as "disingenuous"[1] without even attempting to explain how. It seems like you couldn't find a way to actually reject its obvious relevancy, so you chose just not to do it by using a word that seemed like it should be enough to shut down discussion, and leave it at that. [1]: I'm not entirely sure how the other person was "pretending to know less" by bringing up how SSC had to be taken down because in today's climate, what what was almost done to the author would have threatened his livelihood. It's a quite apt counterpoint to your notion that owning your own domain is some sort of magical protection against censorship.