5 ms·
I've never come across this way of laying out the date: "01/02 03:04:05PM '06 -0700" What about correlating the mnemonic digits to period sizes: "06/
by muxxa 15y ago
I've never come across this way of laying out the date:
"01/02 03:04:05PM '06 -0700"
What about correlating the mnemonic digits to period sizes:
"06/05 03:02:01PM '07 -0400"
(with timezone offset coming between hours and days)
This would correspond to iso:
"2007-06-05T03:02:01.0"
- Scaevolus 15y agoI agree, numbering it in order of period sizes would be easier than remembering the arrangement of the canonical form, especially for international users. (Also, it would be "2007-06-05T15:02:01.0")