3 ms·

Can you point us to any evidence of actual election fraud? If so, what do you make of the courts not being clear about the facts as you see them? Was this evide

Can you point us to any evidence of actual election fraud? If so, what do you make of the courts not being clear about the facts as you see them? Was this evidence simply not part of the tens of lawsuits that were filed or are you suggesting that the courts are simply complicit in this stolen election? Or is it something else?

morganvachon 6y ago
> Can you point us to any evidence of actual election fraud? I certainly can. There is an audio recording of a sitting president asking, then begging, then threatening a Secretary of State to create illegitimate votes to overturn a state election so it goes in his favor. That act was the very definition of election fraud. Perhaps not the kind the person you replied to was inferring, but it's real and we have all witnessed it.
- AnHonestComment 6y ago
  No there’s not. The 4 minute WaPo clip was reality TV levels of editing for drama — and the hour long call didn’t sound like voter fraud. The editing purposefully changed the meaning of Trumps comments... and that those were the most damning four minutes they could find in an hour, a few things that de-contextualized might be suggestive, makes this a case of the media lying. It sounded like someone questioning a very suspicious election. Which I’m unsurprised the WaPo misrepresented.
briantakita 6y ago
The courts don't want to get involved with politics, hence the lack of evidentary hearings & dismissals based on technicalities such as standing, mootness, latches, jurisdiction, lack of injury, etc. A judge has a number of tools to avoid hearing a case. This crowdsource site has a collection of the evidence. https://hereistheevidence.com/ https://hereistheevidence.com/ ~~edit~~ To flip the standard around, the chain of custody has been broken for millions of the votes. This means these votes cannot be verified as being authentic or legal. Also the IT infrastructure is not secure, despite Christopher Krebs' claim. How do I know? Georgia's Election Machines was remotely exploited by Jovan Pulitzer's team. Pulitzer also has diagnostic technology which can forensically verify if a paper ballot is inauthentic. America simply needs to do better. Third world countries have higher standards with their elections. This election (& others) is an embarrassment to the United States. ~~edit~~ To fix these reoccurring issues/embarrassments, we need the following: * All laws need to be followed * A full certified chain of custody for all eligible & legal ballots * Audit ALL Elections * Open Source ALL relevant Election Software & Hardware * Public Domain & distributed Voter Rolls * Public Domain & distributed Precinct data * All Tabulation traffic is logged * All Electronic Ballot images is saved * All ballots are forensically audited using automated processes. The forensic technology should be Open Source. * Equal representation of both parties with the poll workers, poll watchers * Protect poll watchers from harassment & removal * Ensure public health safety measures do not affect Election Integrity

morganvachon 6y ago

> Can you point us to any evidence of actual election fraud? I certainly can. There is an audio recording of a sitting president asking, then begging, then threatening a Secretary of State to create illegitimate votes to overturn a state election so it goes in his favor. That act was the very definition of election fraud. Perhaps not the kind the person you replied to was inferring, but it's real and we have all witnessed it.

AnHonestComment 6y ago
No there’s not. The 4 minute WaPo clip was reality TV levels of editing for drama — and the hour long call didn’t sound like voter fraud. The editing purposefully changed the meaning of Trumps comments... and that those were the most damning four minutes they could find in an hour, a few things that de-contextualized might be suggestive, makes this a case of the media lying. It sounded like someone questioning a very suspicious election. Which I’m unsurprised the WaPo misrepresented.

briantakita 6y ago

The courts don't want to get involved with politics, hence the lack of evidentary hearings & dismissals based on technicalities such as standing, mootness, latches, jurisdiction, lack of injury, etc. A judge has a number of tools to avoid hearing a case. This crowdsource site has a collection of the evidence. https://hereistheevidence.com/ https://hereistheevidence.com/ ~~edit~~ To flip the standard around, the chain of custody has been broken for millions of the votes. This means these votes cannot be verified as being authentic or legal. Also the IT infrastructure is not secure, despite Christopher Krebs' claim. How do I know? Georgia's Election Machines was remotely exploited by Jovan Pulitzer's team. Pulitzer also has diagnostic technology which can forensically verify if a paper ballot is inauthentic. America simply needs to do better. Third world countries have higher standards with their elections. This election (& others) is an embarrassment to the United States. ~~edit~~ To fix these reoccurring issues/embarrassments, we need the following: * All laws need to be followed * A full certified chain of custody for all eligible & legal ballots * Audit ALL Elections * Open Source ALL relevant Election Software & Hardware * Public Domain & distributed Voter Rolls * Public Domain & distributed Precinct data * All Tabulation traffic is logged * All Electronic Ballot images is saved * All ballots are forensically audited using automated processes. The forensic technology should be Open Source. * Equal representation of both parties with the poll workers, poll watchers * Protect poll watchers from harassment & removal * Ensure public health safety measures do not affect Election Integrity