5 ms·
> but the inertia is so great it's not possible. It is possible, but difficult. You may lose access to some groups, but you can't have everything you want with
by agd 6y ago
> but the inertia is so great it's not possible.
It is possible, but difficult. You may lose access to some groups, but you can't have everything you want without some sacrifice.
Personally, I'm leaving WhatsApp. Yes, my family and friends will be a bit annoyed about the hassle of contacting me separately, but so be it.
- 72deluxe 6y agoWhat hassle would that be? They could send you SMS or call you. Would they really find that too difficult? The mind boggles.
- edgarvaldes 6y ago1 on 1 can be done. But group communication? They will leave you out and it will be your burden to get the info using another channels.
- 72deluxe 6y agoThat seems quite the choice to make: learn about group chats or send all your data to Facebook. It seems quite one-sided.
- kubanczyk 6y agoWhatsApp means groups. A lot of groups. Both long-living and ephemeral.
- a254613e 6y agoThat sort of behavior is very selfish, wouldn't you agree? You expect everyone to be annoyed and go through the hassle of contacting you, when you can't even keep one app installed to communicate with all of them. And in a lot of countries you wouldn't lose access to "some groups" but you would lose access to ALL of them, from social, to every other group.
- agd 6y agoYou could easily flip it around. Why should others expect me to sacrifice my privacy to socialise with them? For me, ditching WhatsApp is altruistic, helping make it easier for others to socialise without giving up their privacy and security.