5 ms·
If I am understanding this correctly, the problem is that the paper authors do not provide a specific version or a package.json equivalent. In that case, using
by SCLeo 6y ago
If I am understanding this correctly, the problem is that the paper authors do not provide a specific version or a package.json equivalent. In that case, using dates seem to be the only choice.
- st1x7 6y agoEven if that's the case, using dates isn't a solution because dates don't give you the build that the researcher used. Date of publication is different from the date when the code ran and there is no guarantee that the researcher ran the latest version of every dependency that was available to them anyway. In fact that's very unlikely considering that some their libraries might require older versions. It might not even be possible to take the latest version of every package and use them in the same environment.
- SCLeo 6y agoSo, what is your better alternative then? I honestly believe using version available at that date is better than using the latest version.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]