There's an argument to be made that some things which are considered freedoms should not be considered freedoms because they can result in harm. At what point d

There's an argument to be made that some things which are considered freedoms should not be considered freedoms because they can result in harm. At what point does protecting one exercise of one right of the despised outweigh the consequences of those actions? It's not about the people we dislike, it's about how those people - or anyone - acts, and the results of those actions. I still disapprove regardless of who it is who wants to march under a Nazi banner. Maybe society should have concerns not only along the lines of freedom. Or at least, to integrate both positive and negative liberty. Other Western democratic nations have balanced freedom and dignity quite well.