> Election fraud requires intent, because honest mistakes would have been caught during the recount process; The accusation of election fraud requires intent b

> Election fraud requires intent, because honest mistakes would have been caught during the recount process; The accusation of election fraud requires intent because fraud requires intent. The successful performance of election fraud usually involves not conveying your intent to defraud because then people wouldn't trust your role in the election. > There is absolutely no tracability on ballots, by design, at this stage. Yes, this is why its suspicious that people staged ballots by removing their envelopes, then hid them under a table and waited until the (R) observers had left. So if its known and understood that no one is able to prove that those ballots had a legitimate chain of custody then how are they debunking the allegation that fraud occurred? It sounds like you're saying that the way the system is set up, its not possible to prove that the election was legitimate. > Anyone who is dissatisfied with this election would be impossible to satisfy. Right after you point out that it was designed in a way that would be impossible to verify, you say this.