3 ms·

> The government should have investigated it. Governments did investigate it. That's what an election audit is. The presidential election in Georgia is a good

> The government should have investigated it. Governments did investigate it. That's what an election audit is. The presidential election in Georgia is a good example of this. Georgia's election result from November was counted three times over. Georgia is confident the result is correct. Nevertheless, Trump attempted to get the government of Georgia to commit election fraud for him. He wanted them to "find" an extra 11,780 votes for him. Listen to the full one hour of Trump's phone call on the 2nd of January to Georgia's secretary of state Brad Raffensperger for yourself: https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/04/politics/donald-trump-georgia-election-joe-biden-congress/index.html https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/04/politics/donald-trump-geo... Luckily for America, the government of Georgia stood up to Trump's attempt at election fraud and did not go along with it. > The sitting president simply told it like it was No. He has done nothing but lie to you.

arolihas 6y ago
He won’t listen to this, he’ll make up some excuses of it being out of context.
- deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
- deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
- arolihas 6y ago
  To those who downvoted, was I wrong? He straight up ignored it.
Izkata 6y ago
> Georgia's election result from November was counted three times over. Georgia is confident the result is correct. > Nevertheless, Trump attempted to get the government of Georgia to commit election fraud for him. He wanted them to "find" an extra 11,780 votes for him. Not quite true - that's the misleading summary people have been spreading, started by an out-of-context clip of the conversation. He wasn't trying to find extra votes, he was trying to find and validate votes which he believed could add up to 11,780 disqualified. Just re-counting the votes does not do this, those ballots would simply have been counted each time. Two of the relevant quotes from the transcript: > You had out-of-state voters. They voted in Georgia but they were from out of state, of 4,925. You had absentee ballots sent to vacant, they were absentee ballots sent to vacant addresses. They had nothing on them about addresses, that's 2,326. > The other thing, dead people. So dead people voted and I think the number is close to 5,000 people. And they went to obituaries. They went to all sorts of methods to come up with an accurate number and a minimum is close to about 5,000 voters.
- clouddrover 6y ago
  > Not quite true - that's the misleading summary people have been spreading, started by an out-of-context clip of the conversation. It's not out of context. Listen to the full hour of the phone call. Trump is told repeatedly his claims are false.
  - Izkata 6y ago
    Whether or not he was told his claims are false, I quoted some of the missing context in my comment above. That context is why the shorter clip and summary of the conversation was misleading and wrong.
    - clouddrover 6y ago
      It's not misleading and it's not wrong. He made his goal clear. Listen to the full one hour of the phone call.
      - Izkata 6y ago
        Please read my comments, I read the transcript. There's a link to it from your link. Unless you're saying CNN is outright making stuff up?
        clouddrover 6y ago
        The article includes the phone call. Listen to the full one hour. You're making excuses for him that he doesn't deserve.

arolihas 6y ago

He won’t listen to this, he’ll make up some excuses of it being out of context.

deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
arolihas 6y ago
To those who downvoted, was I wrong? He straight up ignored it.

Izkata 6y ago

> Georgia's election result from November was counted three times over. Georgia is confident the result is correct. > Nevertheless, Trump attempted to get the government of Georgia to commit election fraud for him. He wanted them to "find" an extra 11,780 votes for him. Not quite true - that's the misleading summary people have been spreading, started by an out-of-context clip of the conversation. He wasn't trying to find extra votes, he was trying to find and validate votes which he believed could add up to 11,780 disqualified. Just re-counting the votes does not do this, those ballots would simply have been counted each time. Two of the relevant quotes from the transcript: > You had out-of-state voters. They voted in Georgia but they were from out of state, of 4,925. You had absentee ballots sent to vacant, they were absentee ballots sent to vacant addresses. They had nothing on them about addresses, that's 2,326. > The other thing, dead people. So dead people voted and I think the number is close to 5,000 people. And they went to obituaries. They went to all sorts of methods to come up with an accurate number and a minimum is close to about 5,000 voters.

clouddrover 6y ago
> Not quite true - that's the misleading summary people have been spreading, started by an out-of-context clip of the conversation. It's not out of context. Listen to the full hour of the phone call. Trump is told repeatedly his claims are false.
- Izkata 6y ago
  Whether or not he was told his claims are false, I quoted some of the missing context in my comment above. That context is why the shorter clip and summary of the conversation was misleading and wrong.
  - clouddrover 6y ago
    It's not misleading and it's not wrong. He made his goal clear. Listen to the full one hour of the phone call.
    - Izkata 6y ago
      Please read my comments, I read the transcript. There's a link to it from your link. Unless you're saying CNN is outright making stuff up?
      - clouddrover 6y ago
        The article includes the phone call. Listen to the full one hour. You're making excuses for him that he doesn't deserve.