2 ms·
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/21/seattle-chaz-shooting-police-free-zone https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/21/seattle-chaz... "police
by HideousKojima 6y ago
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/21/seattle-chaz-shooting-police-free-zone https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/21/seattle-chaz...
"police say violent crowd prevented access to victims"
- vkou 6y agoPolice have said a lot of things in Seattle that turned out to be complete falsehoods. Nearly every night of the protest, they'd make false statements that were trivially disproved by video evidence. I'll believe it when its a citation from an impartial third party - a paramedic, a bystander, etc. The fact is, the police retained access to both the East Precinct, and to CHAZ, through the latter's existence. They would show up in small groups of two or three, and were allowed in.
- noxer 6y agoDo you realize how biased you come across? You can pick whatever "evidence" or "source of evidence" you want but you'd still need to apply that standard to "both sides".
- vkou 6y agoI am 'biased' against statements made by the SPD, because they have a verified history of lying on this subject.
- noxer 6y agoLiterally any organization has a history of lying. Completely pointless statement. You have to applies the same standards to both sides. If you want them impossible high then go for it. If you only believe what you have seen with your own eyes then fine. But you cant make any statements about anything you have not seen then.