3 ms·
The argument over 230 is that one can't pretend to be a utility/platform for communication while at the same time restricting what information is allowed to be
by convery 6y ago
The argument over 230 is that one can't pretend to be a utility/platform for communication while at the same time restricting what information is allowed to be published. Lots of these platforms want to have the cake an eat it too; i.e. blacklisting news stories sitewide, banning certain political leanings 21:1, etc. while claiming to be a neutral platform provider that doesn't have a say in what's published.