Thanks very much for those additional details on this case. The original article's viewpoint seems to be suggest that a crazy person sued Facebook for frivolous

Thanks very much for those additional details on this case. The original article's viewpoint seems to be suggest that a crazy person sued Facebook for frivolous reasons and the judge rightly dismissed the case. But that's not what happened at all. The article you link to has such an astonishingly different viewpoint it's almost unimaginable that both articles are talking about the same case, situation and person.