3 ms·
Lack of standing is lack of standing. It's not the courts job to hear random facts about things that aren't cases. They did get to present cases where they had
by 8note 6y ago
Lack of standing is lack of standing. It's not the courts job to hear random facts about things that aren't cases.
They did get to present cases where they had standing, and lost them. Guiliani couldn't even tell a judge whether he was alleging fraud or not. That doesn't mean they get to go to another court to present the same thing.