3 ms·

What kind of multi-device issues do Signal and WhatsApp have exactly? Granted I've never used WhatsApp, but I've been using Signal for like 5 years now on my p

What kind of multi-device issues do Signal and WhatsApp have exactly? Granted I've never used WhatsApp, but I've been using Signal for like 5 years now on my phone and on my laptop with absolutely no issues.

Siira 6y ago
I don't think you can even use the same Signal account on two different iOS devices, much less desktop. Their desktop apps just link to the phone's app. WhatsApp is a total joke, it loses media (IIRC this includes audio messages as well) people send you after a very short time even when you use it on a single device, so talking about multi-device usage is completely out of the overton window.
Jare 6y ago
WhatsApp does not have multi-device, so technically it has no issues with it. (for any sensible definition of multi-device)
alpaca128 6y ago
Signal none, WhatsApp still cannot be used without being activated on a smartphone/tablet, and cannot be activated on more than one mobile device.
franga2000 6y ago
Seriously? Both only have crappy web apps that you basically tunnel messages through your phone (at least that's what I remember) and are tied to a specific mobile device with entire companies being built around the apparently extremely complicated task of moving WhatsApp messages around. Meanwhile, the Telegram desktop client is at feature-parity with the phone app with both running entirely independently on as many devices as you want.
- 7v3x3n3sem9vv 6y ago
  Signal messages are not routed through your phone. Reach has it's own independent queue and the phone can be off and you'll still receive messages on the desktop client. I would also state that it is unfair to compare an app that doesn't have to worry about your privacy and solving real engineering problems vs basically making a web app that can easily sync your data because it's all stored on someone else's computer. If that's the level of privacy you're setting you may as well use email for communicating. It's federated, it's easy to use, and everybody has one. All that said, I do agree the Signal desktop app needs some work, but they'll get there eventually, and in the meantime I don't have to wonder if any of my data will be leaked to anyone outside of my intended recipient.
  - the_lucifer 6y ago
    > basically making a web app Funny you say that because Signal is the one with a crappy Electron app which is definitely a deal breaker for me. I mean I lose E2E with Telegram but gain really well designed and featureful platform apps that are native and non-gimped desktop apps (and a functional linux client. Signal's Ubuntu client just crashed for me).

Siira 6y ago

I don't think you can even use the same Signal account on two different iOS devices, much less desktop. Their desktop apps just link to the phone's app. WhatsApp is a total joke, it loses media (IIRC this includes audio messages as well) people send you after a very short time even when you use it on a single device, so talking about multi-device usage is completely out of the overton window.

Jare 6y ago

WhatsApp does not have multi-device, so technically it has no issues with it. (for any sensible definition of multi-device)

alpaca128 6y ago

Signal none, WhatsApp still cannot be used without being activated on a smartphone/tablet, and cannot be activated on more than one mobile device.

franga2000 6y ago

Seriously? Both only have crappy web apps that you basically tunnel messages through your phone (at least that's what I remember) and are tied to a specific mobile device with entire companies being built around the apparently extremely complicated task of moving WhatsApp messages around. Meanwhile, the Telegram desktop client is at feature-parity with the phone app with both running entirely independently on as many devices as you want.

7v3x3n3sem9vv 6y ago
Signal messages are not routed through your phone. Reach has it's own independent queue and the phone can be off and you'll still receive messages on the desktop client. I would also state that it is unfair to compare an app that doesn't have to worry about your privacy and solving real engineering problems vs basically making a web app that can easily sync your data because it's all stored on someone else's computer. If that's the level of privacy you're setting you may as well use email for communicating. It's federated, it's easy to use, and everybody has one. All that said, I do agree the Signal desktop app needs some work, but they'll get there eventually, and in the meantime I don't have to wonder if any of my data will be leaked to anyone outside of my intended recipient.
- the_lucifer 6y ago
  > basically making a web app Funny you say that because Signal is the one with a crappy Electron app which is definitely a deal breaker for me. I mean I lose E2E with Telegram but gain really well designed and featureful platform apps that are native and non-gimped desktop apps (and a functional linux client. Signal's Ubuntu client just crashed for me).