2 ms·

I clicked on one in the list randomly. #38 8,000 voter application submitted by couple on behalf of homeless and the dead - https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/

I clicked on one in the list randomly. #38 8,000 voter application submitted by couple on behalf of homeless and the dead - https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/pair-charged-with-voter-fraIud-allegedly-submitted-thousands-of-fraudulent-applications-on-behalf-of-homeless-people/2464168/ https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/pair-charged-with-v... A man who tried to run for mayor in Hawthorne is among two people charged in a voter fraud case in which thousands of fraudulent voter registration applications were allegedly submitted on behalf of homeless people, the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office announced Tuesday. It doesn't even allege that any votes were submitted, the article was published Nov 17 so the investigation must have been going on for months. Clicked on #237: Posted confidential voter information on website - https://www.washoecounty.us/voters/elections/20_gen_ab_ev_reports.php https://www.washoecounty.us/voters/elections/20_gen_ab_ev_re... That's the official website for Washoe County and the page is a voter turnout report so yeah obviously it's evidence of fraud (/sarcasm). #356: Count the fraudalent [sic] ballots https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eH3FpIy3TE&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eH3FpIy3TE&feature=youtu.be It's just a youtube video of voting officials talking at a desk or something. That website is evidence of nothing more than someone with too much time on their hands and ideology to push.

Shared404 6y ago
Sounds about right. I didn't have time to get past the landing page when I pulled it up. I'm kinda regretting wasting everyone's time now.
- cyberlurker 6y ago
  If it makes you feel better, I thought it was interesting to see how thin the “evidence” is. In some cases there appears to be no evidence, just the “possibility” that there could be some and that there should be an investigation to find it. I should point out there is a substantial amount of evidence that there is no notable voter fraud. This evidence helps justify not wasting more time and giving oxygen to this conspiracy.
thu2111 6y ago
I think your comment is probably the most deceptive I've ever seen on HN :( "It's just a youtube video of voting officials talking at a desk or something." The discussion they're having at the desk is about fraud. It's a vote counting operation. The counting volunteers say they found a pile of ballots with identical signatures and the woman running the vote is telling them to ignore it because it's not their role to flag this or investigate it. In a vote audit. The video description text has a transcript of what's going on. The female counter asks, “So when we’re done with the audit, there’s still the opportunity to challenge the fact that we have multiple ballots with the very same signature?” she asks. “I don’t know if ‘challenge’ is the right word,” the SOS official says ... “And again, we know that you have a concern with this precinct,” she tells them, explaining, “That’s not your role at this very moment,” A video of counting volunteers discussing fraud they detected and being explicitly told to drop it is very far from "just talking at a desk or something".

Shared404 6y ago

Sounds about right. I didn't have time to get past the landing page when I pulled it up. I'm kinda regretting wasting everyone's time now.

cyberlurker 6y ago
If it makes you feel better, I thought it was interesting to see how thin the “evidence” is. In some cases there appears to be no evidence, just the “possibility” that there could be some and that there should be an investigation to find it. I should point out there is a substantial amount of evidence that there is no notable voter fraud. This evidence helps justify not wasting more time and giving oxygen to this conspiracy.

thu2111 6y ago

I think your comment is probably the most deceptive I've ever seen on HN :( "It's just a youtube video of voting officials talking at a desk or something." The discussion they're having at the desk is about fraud. It's a vote counting operation. The counting volunteers say they found a pile of ballots with identical signatures and the woman running the vote is telling them to ignore it because it's not their role to flag this or investigate it. In a vote audit. The video description text has a transcript of what's going on. The female counter asks, “So when we’re done with the audit, there’s still the opportunity to challenge the fact that we have multiple ballots with the very same signature?” she asks. “I don’t know if ‘challenge’ is the right word,” the SOS official says ... “And again, we know that you have a concern with this precinct,” she tells them, explaining, “That’s not your role at this very moment,” A video of counting volunteers discussing fraud they detected and being explicitly told to drop it is very far from "just talking at a desk or something".