3 ms·
That just seems short sighted as the seller's account would be tracked down sooner or later. Entering your real details on a receiving account is way too risky.
by kuroguro 6y ago
That just seems short sighted as the seller's account would be tracked down sooner or later. Entering your real details on a receiving account is way too risky.
It would be possible to launder with a similar setup - just not with stolen cards but with prepaid cash/crypto ones so amazon doesn't flag the account for charge-backs. But then there's no real need to steal the book author's identity. You could just put your own name or a pseudonym on it. For a 1099 to arrive they've clearly entered the stolen SSN somewhere. You'd want your own SSN there to prove to the IRS that you've made the money... (and then you'd want to pay the taxes).
- elliekelly 6y agoNot if you’re transferring the funds to a non-US account via wire transfer. They time it perfectly so the money is in and out of the person’s account before the person even realizes it and by the time they do it’s too late. The money is gone.
- kuroguro 6y agoI guess it could be. Either that or I'm overestimating the thief's long term planning ability :) Still - if they're not paying the taxes I wouldn't call it laundering.
- elliekelly 6y agoThats an odd distinction to draw. The definition of money laundering has nothing to do with taxes.