3 ms·
Only if every ISP cooperate and there is no single one bad actors (eg. individuals) boosting their own transmit power for their own good. Also, TX power is not
by alacombe 6y ago
Only if every ISP cooperate and there is no single one bad actors (eg. individuals) boosting their own transmit power for their own good.
Also, TX power is not all about interference: attenuation, there is very good reason to transmit at max power for best wall penetration / range. Even in a suburban/rural setting, with more and more devices connected remotely, you need the range. It's not in a manufacturer best interest to decrease the range of their routers. Only a small fraction of user will look at setting the TX power / investing in a better antenna / setup mesh network. The first reflex will always be "buy a new router".
So once again, max legal transmit power is the best overall bet.
- wtallis 6y ago> Only if every ISP cooperate and there is no single one bad actors (eg. individuals) boosting their own transmit power for their own good. Could you please try to re-write that sentence in a way that gives me some indication that you actually read and understood my last two comments? Because it seems like you're simply repeating an assertion without addressing any of the points I brought up, and I'm not sure whether my explanations were inadequate or just unwanted.
- alacombe 6y agoThe points you brought up are irrelevant to the "effective range" argument. Range requires TX power, so maximum legal range is inherently the same as maximum legal TX power.