3 ms·
No. The opposite. I'm trying to say that open standards aren't really open if they can't be broadly implemented.
by benjaminjosephw 6y ago
No. The opposite. I'm trying to say that open standards aren't really open if they can't be broadly implemented.
- jaywalk 6y agoSo in order for you to consider a standard "open" it has to be simple? We aren't allowed to have open standards above a certain level of complexity?
- timw4mail 6y agoBreadth of current standards is more of an issue, I would argue. As the number of browser standards has increased, the number of browser engines (and platforms capable of running those browser engines) has decreased, and the computing power needed for web browsing has increased.