The parent link is a journalistic version of the information, not the scientific paper(s) with the evidence. Besides, the closest equivalent in software is: I

The parent link is a journalistic version of the information, not the scientific paper(s) with the evidence. Besides, the closest equivalent in software is: If you have ~20 lines of code, written twice with the same function (perhaps crossing multiple functions in the same order), written with identical style and syntax, with maybe some variable names being slightly different. In a copyright case, would you believe that these originate from different authors?