3 ms·
It's honestly too simple, more work has to be done to get it to be actually useful and scalable.
by KaoruAoiShiho 6y ago
It's honestly too simple, more work has to be done to get it to be actually useful and scalable.
- capableweb 6y agoSuch a strange wording. Sounds like you're saying "It's too simple, we need to make it more not-simple" while anyone would agree that simple is better than non-simple. What if it can be simple, useful and scalable? That's the ideal I think.
- cakoose 6y agoI don't think it's categorically wrong to say something is too simple. There are accepted terms for that: over-simplification, simplistic. There's also the Einstein line: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler." I have no idea if PeerJS is actually too simple, but the "shape" of KaoruAoiShiho's statement seems fine.
- superkuh 6y agoNo application implemented within a browser is "simple". It's obfuscated and hidden complexity of a scale so large than only mega-corps are capable of handling, and so chosing, which directions things go. Simple would be a real application not subject to the constant churn and complexity of corporate driven web.