IDK, reading stuff like below makes me discard the whole article: > Saving money, whether in or outside of a bank, does NOT contribute to growth Literally nex

IDK, reading stuff like below makes me discard the whole article: > Saving money, whether in or outside of a bank, does NOT contribute to growth Literally next line > Taking out loans and new debt contributes to economic growth. Where does the money for a load come from though? Does the author not see the connection there (making him kind of unfit to explain complex economic mechanisms), or just dishonestly ignores this part to support his thesis (which makes him unfit to waste my time)?