4 ms·
Given the use of the term "grammar", I was expecting an article on Frame Semantics [1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_semantics_(linguistics) https:/
by kleiba 6y ago
Given the use of the term "grammar", I was expecting an article on Frame Semantics [1].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_semantics_(linguistics) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_semantics_(linguistics)
- bra-ket 6y agothanks , this is relevant to Rosch's prototype theory I've been reading on recently https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototype_theory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototype_theory, and also Gärdenfors' conceptual spaces, which is more modern and has some neurophysiological basis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptual_space https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptual_space OP, sorry for hijacking the thread
- kleiba 6y agoThis is not too surprising, since Rosch and Fillmore were both at Berkeley when cognitive linguistics took shape there.
- aaron-santos 6y agoI was excited for the same reason. I explored neo-davidsonian semantics last year in the context of graph grammars. It would be great to get back into that project.
- bra-ket 6y agothanks for mentioning, just googled "neo-davidsonian semantics" and stumbled upon this very interesting seminar on syntax-semantic interface: http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/courses/incsem-12/ http://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/courses/incsem-12/
- kleiba 6y agoYeah, Saarbrucken is a renowned place for comp ling.