3 ms·
The census you link is from the current admin and I was shocked to see it written that way. I don't think it's right or normal at all and I don't agree that thi
by unityByFreedom 6y ago
The census you link is from the current admin and I was shocked to see it written that way. I don't think it's right or normal at all and I don't agree that this was standard practice prior to this admin.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> I don't think it's right or normal at all and I don't agree that this was standard practice prior to this admin. It's normal (the basic structure has been used since 1980), though there was a proposal which didn't end up being used to consolidate the race and Hispanic origin questions for 2020.
- unityByFreedom 6y agoWikipedia writes, > The 2010 US Census included changes designed to more clearly distinguish Hispanic ethnicity as not being a race. That included adding the sentence: "For this census, Hispanic origins are not races." Government forms should simply ask about ethnicity, not race, and certainly shouldn't be asking both. I don't see why anyone who isn't racist would object to that. You can definitively call someone racist for listing ethnicities as different races. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_ethnicity_in_the_United_States_Census https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_ethnicity_in_the_Un...