3 ms·
There's enough existing 747 cargo fleets to soak up any excess supply of decommissioned passenger 747s. The A380 wasn't designed for cargo so the economics don
by notatoad 6y ago
There's enough existing 747 cargo fleets to soak up any excess supply of decommissioned passenger 747s.
The A380 wasn't designed for cargo so the economics don't work out for many cargo loads. It's also limited in what airports it can operated out of. I'm sure there is some route out there where it will end up as an ideal freighter when they start retiring from passenger service, but it is not very flexible. Definitely not where you'd want to start building out your cargo fleet.
- redis_mlc 6y ago> The A380 wasn't designed for cargo so the economics don't work out for many cargo loads. True, but it's much worse than that. The A380 is heavier than it should be, at least 11,000 pounds. And the operating cost per hour is 3x anything else. The plan was to design a separate cargo version, but the orders and internal desire weren't there. Airbus ate at least $50 billion in losses on the A380, and counting. That was on top of many other problems affecting other models, which is why Boeing and Airbus still make roughly the same number of planes annually, despite both having huge problems.