3 ms·
The problem is that the huge suburban "exclusion zone" around cities means that central parts of the metro are very far from open green space. Compare e.g. the
by scythe 6y ago
The problem is that the huge suburban "exclusion zone" around cities means that central parts of the metro are very far from open green space. Compare e.g. the development pattern around Cologne-Essen:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Cologne,+Germany/@51.201637,6.7986817,9.71z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x47bf259169ab2fe5:0x42760fc4a2a77f0!8m2!3d50.937531!4d6.9602786 https://www.google.com/maps/place/Cologne,+Germany/@51.20163...
to Houston:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Houston,+TX/@29.759369,-95.5165806,11.01z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x8640b8b4488d8501:0xca0d02def365053b!8m2!3d29.7604267!4d-95.3698028 https://www.google.com/maps/place/Houston,+TX/@29.759369,-95...
In the one case you are never more than five miles from green space, in the other you may be 20+ in the middle. It's a tragedy of the commons -- no one driveway thinks it caused the flood (literally, in some cases!). Even Paris is more compact than Houston despite having 2x the population!
This can affect air quality, urban heat islands, mental health, etc.
- zten 6y agoYeah, I understand it's not a good pattern of development for huge metro areas. But someone managed to get the laws on the books to basically require the US to develop in this way, and people aren't fighting _too_ hard to change it. It's not hard to imagine, then, that there might be some competitive advantages to a car-centric lifestyle for individuals to live in that situation even if it's worse for the collective.