3 ms·
> It's fast enough for 99% of apps out of the box. It's fast enough for 99.99% of the apps with minimal tuning. It might be true that Clojure is fast enough f
by mbrodersen 6y ago
> It's fast enough for 99% of apps out of the box. It's fast enough for 99.99% of the apps with minimal tuning.
It might be true that Clojure is fast enough for the apps you write. I know it is not true for the apps I write and have worked on in my professional career.
- raspasov 6y agoIs Java fast enough for the apps you write? What kind of apps do you write?
- darksaints 6y agoFrom a performance perspective, Clojure isn't even close to Java. Although it's probably not worse than Python or Ruby. There are millions of apps out there that are performance sensitive enough to not use Python or Ruby, but not so performance sensitive that they couldn't use Java. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1424342/FULLTEXT01.pdf https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1424342/FULLTEXT...
- 0xc0171 6y agoWow, performance comparison by someone writing Clojure for the first time, wonder how that will go. Here's what someone with more than superficial understanding of the language can produce. Try not to base your argument on the first google search result next time https://github.com/joinr/performancepaper https://github.com/joinr/performancepaper